CMR consignment note: signature and reservations

The CMR consignment note accompanies the goods from sender to carrier and finally to consignee. A signature does not automatically confirm that every entry is correct or that the goods were taken over or delivered without damage. The relevant questions are who signed, when the signature was given and whether deviations were recorded in the consignment note.

The CMR Convention distinguishes between signatures on the consignment note, reservations made by the carrier at takeover and reservations made by the consignee at delivery. These situations serve different purposes. Confusing them can create evidentiary problems when packages are missing, packaging is damaged or a cargo defect is discovered only after delivery.

This article explains how companies, carriers, freight forwarders, senders and consignees should use a CMR consignment note in practice. It focuses on the checks at takeover, the wording of reservations, delivery and subsequent documentation. The overview on consignment notes and documentation places the issue within the wider freight-law context.

Article 5 CMR provides for three original copies of the consignment note, signed by the sender and the carrier. The first copy is handed to the sender, the second accompanies the goods and the third is retained by the carrier. The Convention permits printed signatures or stamps where the law of the place of issue allows this. Whether an electronic signature is sufficient in a particular process therefore depends on the applicable law and the system used.

The signature first confirms the statement made on the consignment note. It does not replace a check of the goods, number of packages, marks, weight, packaging, loading place or delivery place. A signed delivery does not turn damaged goods into undamaged goods. The evidentiary position depends on whether the condition at the relevant time was recorded in a specific and comprehensible way.

Under Article 9 CMR, the consignment note is prima facie evidence of the making of the contract of carriage, its terms and the carrier’s receipt of the goods. If the consignment note contains no specific reservations by the carrier, it is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the goods and packaging appeared to be in good condition and that the package details matched the note. That presumption can be rebutted, but it should not be challenged without a clear record of the facts.

Article 6 CMR lists the essential particulars: the date and place of issue, the names and addresses of sender and carrier, the place and date of taking over, the designated place of delivery, the consignee, a usual description of the goods and packaging, the number and marks or numbers of packages, gross weight or another quantity, carriage charges and the instructions required for customs or other formalities. The note should also state that the carriage is subject to the CMR Convention.

Depending on the case, further entries may be relevant, including a prohibition on trans-shipment, charges payable by the sender, cash on delivery, a declared value, a special interest in delivery, insurance instructions, an agreed time limit for carriage or a list of documents handed to the carrier. These entries are not merely administrative. They define the information available to the carrier and the framework in which later deviations are assessed.

In practice, the order, packing list, delivery note and consignment note should be compared before the goods are handed over. If descriptions do not match, the discrepancy should not be hidden by a blanket signature. The shipping-document checklist helps organise the documents before handover.

At takeover, Article 8 CMR requires the carrier to check the statements about the number of packages and their marks and numbers. The carrier must also check the apparent condition of the goods and their packaging. If the carrier has no reasonable means of checking the particulars, an appropriate reservation should be entered in the consignment note.

A useful reservation does not merely state that something was “not checked”. It gives the concrete reason, such as a sealed loading unit, no opportunity to open it, illegible markings or inaccessible inner packaging. If the goods or packaging show visible damage, the carrier should record the finding and the basis of the reservation as specifically as possible. Under Article 8 paragraph 2, such a reservation does not bind the sender unless the sender expressly agrees to it in the consignment note.

A signature without reservation can later weigh against the carrier if the damage or discrepancy would have been apparent on a proper check. Conversely, a blanket reservation is not a licence for every later allegation. The decisive factors remain the actual situation at takeover, the documents and the other available evidence.

At delivery, the consignee should check the condition of the goods together with the carrier. If damage or a shortage is apparent, the finding should normally be entered in the consignment note or in a written statement clearly linked to it no later than delivery. Signing “received in good order” or an unclear standard formula can make later proof considerably more difficult.

The reservation should at least give a general indication of the loss or damage. It is sensible to identify the affected packages, visible damage, missing parts, damaged packaging and the time of discovery. Photographs, a condition report and copies of the delivery note and consignment note support the entry. The consignee should keep a copy or electronic proof of the signed document.

For damage that was not apparent, Article 30 CMR provides for a written reservation within seven days after delivery, excluding Sundays and public holidays. For delay, it provides for a written reservation within 21 days from the time the goods were placed at the consignee’s disposal. These rules do not remove the need for a case-specific review, but they show why immediate written documentation matters.

Apparent damage can be recognised at delivery without a special examination, for example torn packaging, a dented casing or visible contamination. The consignee should not confirm delivery with an unclear standard phrase. The condition should be described in a comprehensible way on the consignment note and, where possible, supported by photographs.

Hidden damage becomes apparent only after opening the packaging or testing the goods. The consignee should preserve the packaging and goods in the condition in which the defect was found, inform the carrier and the other relevant parties promptly in writing and invite a joint inspection. The written reservation under Article 30 CMR should not be confused with an internal note that never reaches the carrier.

The distinction depends on the actual goods and the reasonable scope of an ordinary delivery check. Not every defect can be discovered during a short handover. For that reason, the receiving process should clearly define the inspection of goods, packaging and function. For valuable or sensitive goods, a documented incoming inspection can materially improve the later enforcement of a claim.

The CMR consignment note is an important piece of evidence, but it does not decide liability on its own. It shows which particulars were recorded at the time of contracting and takeover. Liability also depends on the time and cause of the loss or damage, the carrier’s custody, packaging, instructions and any applicable exclusions or limits of liability.

In a dispute, the complete transport file should therefore be preserved, not only the signed pages: order, consignment note, delivery note, packing list, photographs, weight records, temperature or telematics data, e-mails, the complaint, the carrier’s response and documents supporting the amount of loss. A contradictory description in the complaint can be as problematic as a missing reservation.

The CMR liability check offers an initial orientation on loss, damage and delay. It does not replace a review of the transport file. In cross-border carriage, it should also be clarified which courts and which version of the contractual documents are relevant. The overview on CMR and the transport contract explains the wider legal framework.

Senders should check before handover that the goods, packaging, packages and consignment note match. Special properties, sensitive parts and visible pre-existing damage should be recorded. The carrier should confirm only what could actually be checked and should record any limitation and its reason in the consignment note.

Carriers should allow time for an external check at takeover. A reservation should correspond to the actual finding and should not consist only of a general clause. If several vehicles, types of goods or separate lots are involved, Article 5 CMR allows a separate consignment note to be required for each vehicle, type or lot.

Consignees should organise delivery so that a short inspection is possible. If damage is visible, they should ask the driver to record it jointly, check the wording in the consignment note and retain proof. If damage is hidden, they should not dispose of or repair the goods and packaging prematurely, but should communicate the findings in a written and comprehensible way.

A common mistake is signing a consignment note even though the number of packages or visible damage was not checked. If the check cannot be performed, the limitation should be documented rather than silently confirmed. Another mistake is a blanket reservation without an actual description. It does not automatically make later proof easier.

It is also dangerous to assume that an internal note is sufficient. A reservation must reach the carrier in the required form. Likewise, a complaint that only states an invoice amount but does not explain which goods were received, when they were received and in what condition leaves important questions unanswered.

Finally, delivery is not necessarily the end of every inspection. Hidden damage, functional defects and delay require a separate response. The exact time calculation and legal effect depend on the contract, the damage and the applicable rules. An organised transport file provides the necessary foundation.

Start by preserving the complete CMR consignment note, including all pages and entries. Add the order, delivery note, packing list, photographs and communication with sender, carrier, freight forwarder and consignee. Record when the goods were taken over, delivered and inspected. For hidden damage, also record when it was discovered and which packaging is still available.

Then check whether the signature confirms a specific statement, whether the carrier’s reservation is sufficiently reasoned and whether the consignee notified the damage or delay in writing and on time. The issue is not only whether a document was signed, but what the documentation means in its entire context.

If a complaint has already been rejected or a substantial loss is involved, the transport file should be reviewed by a lawyer. This clarifies which claims, evidence and next steps are useful in the individual matter.

Receive new articles and legal updates from the firm with BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.